Facial recognition technology sued in Indian court

Automatic facial recognition in India is one of the largest in the world.

REPUBLIKA.CO.ID, JAKARTA – Saat lockdown In the Indian city of Hyderabad, activist SQ Masood was stopped by police on the street. He was asked to remove his mask, then took a picture of it without explanation and ignored his protests.

Concerned that his photo might be misused, Masood sent an official letter to the city’s police chief. After his letter went unanswered, he filed a lawsuit last month over the use of the facial recognition system in Telangana state. The case is the first in India.

“As a Muslim working with a minority who are often targeted by the police, I was concerned that my photos would be misused and that I would be humiliated,” said Masood, 38.

“It’s also about the right to privacy and the right to know why I was photographed, what it was used for, who had access to it and how the photograph was protected. Everyone has the right to know this information,” he said.

Masood’s petition is seen as a “test” for facial recognition systems being installed across India. Digital rights activists say the system violates privacy and other fundamental rights.

face recognition technology (face recognition) with artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence/AI) to match a person’s image to an existing image in the database. This technology is widely used for various purposes, e.g. B. to unlock mobile phones and to report yourself (Check in) at the airport.

Using the automatic face recognition system in India to be one of the largest in the world. The Indian government previously said India needs to step up security to prevent crime and locate missing children. But there’s little evidence the technology is reducing crime rates, critics say.

The system also failed to accurately identify dark-skinned people and women. Its use becomes problematic if India has no privacy laws, digital rights activists say.

“The technology is being implemented very quickly in India as 24/7 monitoring is necessary and good for us,” said Anushka Jain of the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), a digital rights group in Delhi.

“It’s important to oppose that idea, and court cases like this one will help raise public awareness. Most people don’t even know they’re being watched,” said Jain, a fellow IFF adviser who helped prepare the petition.

Source: between

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.